As pioneers in high-impact tech and privacy cases, we’ve been at the forefront of AI litigation, leveraging our in-house technical expertise to address emerging harms. We’ve represented individuals, businesses, classes, and states with regard to AI-related issues—including copyright, teen safety issues, and fraudulent practices.
Our AI cases have collectively put at stake billions of dollars, including:
- Representing state Attorneys General in investigating and prosecuting first-of-their-kind cases against major tech companies for dangerous AI products that are causing harm to teens nationwide.
- Serve as counsel representing the interests of publishers in first-ever certified copyright class action against an AI company. The suit alleges industry-wide copyright infringement against Anthropic, and seeks billions in statutory damages. Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, Inc., No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.).
- Brought suit on behalf of consumers against a self-proclaimed “robot lawyer” alleging the company fraudulently claimed to be using AI and provided unauthorized legal services. Company ceased use of “robot lawyer” language and stopped offering legal services in California. Faridian v. DoNotPay, Inc., 23-cv-01692 (N.D. Cal.).
- Successfully represented ACLU and other public interest organizations in a lawsuit against Clearview AI, resulting in a consent decree barring Clearview from offering its AI-powered facial recognition products to the private market nationwide, and banning it entirely from Illinois for five years. American Civil Liberties Union v. Clearview AI, Inc., No. 20 CH 4353 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cty.). The settlement has been called a “milestone for civil rights.”
- Provided training to hundreds of federal judges across the country on AI issues, including with the Federal Judicial Center and the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.
- Advise state and federal lawmakers on AI safety.