Edelson PC’s Antitrust Practice–led by Partner Natasha Fernández-Silber–is at the forefront of cutting-edge antitrust cases, including price-fixing and monopolization cases in industries of critical importance to consumers, workers, and small businesses.
Some of our notable cases include:
- Our attorneys were appointed to serve as Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel in In re Multiplan, No. 24-md-6795 (N.D. Ill.) (Kennelly, J.), a price-fixing antitrust suit brought on behalf of a proposed class of out-of-network healthcare providers against major insurance companies.
- We serve as Special Acting Attorneys General to the Michigan Attorney General’s Office in Michigan v. Express Scripts et. al., 25-cv-11215 (E.D. Mich.), which alleges that the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) Express Scripts and Prime have engaged in price-fixing at the expense of local pharmacies, leading to mass pharmacy closures throughout the State of Michigan.
- We represent a proposed class of indirect purchasers in Mass. Laborers’ Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc. et al. (24-cv-10565), which alleges that brand-name drug manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim has unlawfully monopolized the markets for two Respimat inhaler products by wrongfully listing device patents in the FDA’s Orange Book.
- We are counsel for the National Community Pharmacists Association and a proposed class of pharmacists in an antitrust price-fixing suit against GoodRx and several major PBMs. In re GoodRx & PBM Antitrust Litig., No. 25-md-03148 (D.R.I.).
- And we represent a proposed class of renters of construction equipment in AXG Roofing, LLC v. RB Global, Inc. et al., 25-cv-03487 (N.D. Ill.), another antitrust price-fixing suit.
Our attorneys and staff stand ready to investigate any potential antitrust violations of which you may be aware. Contact us now for a free consultation.